dc.contributor.author | Musoke, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Miiro, George | |
dc.contributor.author | Karani, George | |
dc.contributor.author | Morris, Keith | |
dc.contributor.author | Kasasa, Simon | |
dc.contributor.author | Ndejjo, Rawlance | |
dc.contributor.author | Nakiyingi-Miiro, Jessica | |
dc.contributor.author | Guwatudde, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Musoke, Miph Boses | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-07T05:48:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-07T05:48:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Musoke D et al. (2015). Promising Perceptions, Divergent Practices and Barriers to Integrated Malaria Prevention in Wakiso District, Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study. PLoS ONE 10(4): 1-14. | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122699 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10570/4396 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background
The World Health Organization recommends use of multiple approaches to control malaria.
The integrated approach to malaria prevention advocates the use of several malaria prevention
methods in a holistic manner. This study assessed perceptions and practices on integrated
malaria prevention in Wakiso district, Uganda. Methods
A clustered cross-sectional survey was conducted among 727 households from 29 villages
using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Assessment was done on awareness of
various malaria prevention methods, potential for use of the methods in a holistic manner,
and reasons for dislike of certain methods. Households were classified as using integrated
malaria prevention if they used at least two methods. Logistic regression was used to test
for factors associated with the use of integrated malaria prevention while adjusting for clustering
within villages.Results
Participants knew of the various malaria prevention methods in the integrated approach including
use of insecticide treated nets (97.5%), removing mosquito breeding sites (89.1%),
clearing overgrown vegetation near houses (97.9%), and closing windows and doors early in
the evenings (96.4%). If trained, most participants (68.6%) would use all the suggested malaria
prevention methods of the integrated approach. Among those who would not use all
methods, the main reasons given were there being too many (70.2%) and cost (32.0%). Only 33.0%households were using the integrated approach to prevent malaria. Use of integrated
malaria prevention by households was associated with reading newspapers (AOR 0.34; 95%
CI 0.22 –0.53) and ownership of a motorcycle/car (AOR 1.75; 95%CI 1.03 – 2.98).
Conclusion
Although knowledge of malaria prevention methods was high and perceptions on the integrated
approach promising, practices on integrated malaria prevention was relatively low.
The use of the integrated approach can be improved by promoting use of multiple malaria prevention methods through various communication channels such as mass media. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Presidential Initiative on Malaria Research (Uganda National Council for Science and Technology) | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | PLOS One | en_US |
dc.subject | Integrated Malaria Prevention | en_US |
dc.subject | Uganda | en_US |
dc.title | Promising Perceptions, Divergent Practices and Barriers to Integrated Malaria Prevention in Wakiso District, Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |