Response of local cassava varieties in Uganda to cassava mosaic virus disease

Abstract

Cassava mosaic disease (CMD) resistant varieties have been used to manage CMD in Uganda. In spite the availability of a number of CMD resistant cultivars, several local landraces are continually grown in Uganda because they possess certain desirable traits, which may not have been fully met by the resistant varieties. Field based trials were setup to evaluate the response to CMD of some landraces that became prominent after the 1990s CMD pandemic. Experiments were located in areas where CMD is reported to have subsided namely, Mukono (Central Uganda) and Bulindi (Western Uganda). Three landraces were evaluated per site along with resistant (Nase 4) and susceptible (Bao) standards. Plots were planted with materials obtained from either diseased or healthy fields. The results showed differences in sensitivity to CMD among varieties tested, with landraces consistently having higher CMD incidences than Nase 4. The landraces tested in Mukono were more susceptible to CMD than even the Bao, while at Bulindi on the other hand, only Sibampale proved to be more resistant than Bao. There were differences in the whitefly populations among the cassava varieties and locations. High whitefly populations characterized all landraces and Nase 4. In most tested varieties, there was a higher infestation of whiteflies on healthy than diseased plants. Low spread of CMD among local landraces was observed in Bulindi as would be expected in areas where CMD has almost subsided (low pressure areas). However, in Mukono, disease spread among landraces was very rapid and high CMD incidences reaching 100% were recorded regardless of whether plots were planted with healthy or diseased cuttings suggesting it to be a CMD hot-spot. Thus, the use of clean planting materials as an effective phytosanitary method can only be employed under low disease pressure while high disease pressure areas need use of resistant varieties.